Yeah, if someone got a team together to do what they do best, my law - laws in genetics first. They can derive a system law of the experiment should look like. Right now if no one gets the call...everyone is using the old methods, they assume the data base from the papers are right, so they repeat the experiment to get themselves guessing. Yes, it’s a guessing field, a roughly possible outcomes. If my laws are done sequencing ...well...they around the worlds can just say they are using the Buttom of pyramid to go upward. Mine laws is top to go below. They are guessing it. Probably to some degree, some data will be used ...you just never correlate everyone data and there is no law in genetics to begin a work ? It sounds bad, but I assume they done sequencing is by the species of the animal ...although it’s a guess, but they discover something, right ? You have to isolate it out a protein to publish a paper. That exists. Just don’t apply to anyone else. It might exist in a define system, that’s everyone reading the same papers. They pick their subjects by guessing which gonna isolate the protein out ...without that isolation products, you got no funding. So they compete who guessing the paper right to get “a result”. They are NOT doing it so everyone can work together. Everyone is guessing whom can stand tall in the Washington. That’s the reality.
Babaji: that bad?
I heard something, so I say my views. Of course I know that. It’s a random guess by reading enough papers, everyone in that fields. The scientists.
No comments:
Post a Comment